Resources

In the High Court Asylum Aid argued that the Home Office operated a secret policy to frustrate the right to leave to remain of at least 1,600 people it had itself determined are confirmed victims of trafficking and modern slavery. The secret policy, approved by the then-Home Secretary, was to block the implementation of a landmark High Court judgment (KTT v SSHD) which required the Home Office to grant recognised modern slavery victims leave to remain where they had a pending asylum claim (‘KTT leave’).

We are delighted that the Supreme Court has upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal that Rwanda is not a safe country for people seeking asylum and that no-one should be sent to Rwanda. It is now time for the government to abandon measures under the Illegal Migration Act 2023 that would require the newly appointed Home Secretary to block people in need of protection from seeking asylum in the UK, and to send them to ‘third countries’ which would have included Rwanda.

To support them with understanding the complex system, we formed a pro bono collaborative with commercial law firms called the Ukrainian Collaborative Pro Bono Project (UCPBP) to provide bespoke advice on the numerous schemes that the UK had set up for Ukrainians in early 2022.

Asylum Aid is excited to announce the launch of our Guide to Statelessness Applications on our website. It covers all aspects of statelessness, including how to make an application for leave to remain as a stateless person in the UK. As a leading provider of free, high-quality legal representation for stateless people in the UK, we have created this Guide to share our expertise and insights in an accessible resource for both practitioners and people applying to be recognised as stateless.

Asylum Aid is delighted to launch a pilot programme of training, supervision and peer support for immigration advisers working in advice deserts across England and Wales. The pilot, kindly funded by the Justice Together Initiative, will increase access to high-quality and holistic immigration legal advice for people seeking asylum, refugees and other vulnerable people in the immigration system.

The Migrants’ Law Project is a legal and public legal educational project. It works to enforce, advance and defend the legal rights of people seeking asylum and others with insecure legal status through securing substantive changes in policy and practice. The MLP joined Asylum Aid in 2023 from its previous home at Islington Law Centre. We joined forces because we know that there is a severe lack of access to quality legal support for vulnerable people with insecure legal status in the UK.

This Government, through the ‘Illegal Migration Bill’, seeks to strip those fleeing war, persecution and human rights abuses of their right to seek safety in this country. It seeks to destroy long held principles of fairness in our justice system – that of access to the courts and equality before the law. The Helen Bamber Foundation and Asylum Aid will resist the passing and implementation of this Bill with all the means at our disposal.

We are delighted to have been selected by the Justice Together Initiative as a grantee partner to deliver a 3-year pilot of a programme of training, supervision and peer support to immigration advisers working in advice deserts across England and Wales. We believe this programme can function as a pilot that demonstrates the long-term value and cost-effectiveness of investing in training a sustainable pipeline of expert immigration advisers who are well-networked, supported to provide advice in complex cases and who are prepared to train and support new advisers moving into the field.

Asylum Aid is partnering with the Justice Together Initiative to provide in depth training for OISC Level 2 advisers who want to deliver complex casework at OISC Level 2 and 3, particularly in complex asylum, human rights and trafficking cases. We are seeking expressions of interest from organisations who want to support their OISC advisers to gain increased confidence and expertise in working in more complex asylum, human rights and trafficking cases.

Our challenge to the Home Office’s Rwanda policy was heard in the High Court on 13 and 14 October. This followed earlier hearings on 5-9 September of the cases brought by Care4Calais, Detention Action, the PCSU and a number of individuals, and a hearing on 12 October of a case focused on the data sharing parts of the Rwanda agreement. At the hearing, our barristers presented the evidence and legal arguments to support our case that the Home Office has adopted a procedure for sending people to Rwanda which is unlawful and unfair.